*** ****
251
replied, that there was no Statute of the
United States which auth
thorized relief to
their insane & destitute citizens in foreign= ports; that it was possible, however, that the authorities of the State, or city, where the lunatic was born, or might have
acquired
a domicile, might be disposed to relieve her, but that unfortimately
no knowledge as
there was
to where that
2quiry for
might have been, although he would endeavour to institute an en the purpose of ascertaining.
A copy of Sir 2. Thorton's despatch. was then communicated to the Colonial Office, and here the matter appears to have ended, for there is no trace of any further correspondence, having taken place upon
subject.
the
Presuming therefore, that the U. 3. Law
072
To Ser 2. Thor 185.27 June
on the subject is still the same
was in 1876, which would appear
the case
it
to be
in
according to the Enclosures the Colonial Office letter, it seems
that all that
Cam
be done
in the
Chlam
present instance is to bring Campbell's
to the notice of the U.S. Govt in the event of either his relations, the authorities of his native town Brooklyn,
or of the State of New York, being disposed to receive him.
The state of the American Law on
as quoted by Mr Fish, would
making
to to Coming!
12 July
the subject,
also appear
to
preclude
Our
any general request for the repatriation of future cases of the same kind, even
if
the Colony of Hong kong are prepared to
establish
Ce
system of reciprocal repatriation
not of lunaties, which fact is
stated
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.